Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Magun v. Bombaci

Connecticut Superior Court
492 A.2d 235 (1985)


Bombaci (defendant) granted a general warranty deed conveying his residential property to Magun (plaintiff). The deed covenanted that there were no undisclosed encumbrances on the property or its appurtenances. The deed did not define or locate the appurtenances, but both Bombaci and Magun assumed they included the adjacent driveway and sewer line. Magun later discovered that portions of the driveway and sewer line actually lay on the neighboring lot. Magun sued Bombaci for breaching the covenant against encumbrances. Magun argued that the driveway and sewer line were so related to the reasonable use of the property that they were among the appurtenances to which the deed applied.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Higgins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial