Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Magwood v. Patterson

United States Supreme Court
130 S. Ct. 2788 (2010)


Facts

On March 1, 1979, Billy Joe Magwood (plaintiff) shot and killed a sheriff. Magwood was charged with aggravated murder. Magwood was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to death. Magwood filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 eight days before his scheduled execution. The Federal District Court stayed his execution. It conditionally granted the application on grounds that the trial court failed to consider statutory mitigating circumstances, and required that Magwood either be released or resentenced. In September 1986, the trial court found that statutory mitigating circumstances existed but that the aggravated nature of the murder still justified the death penalty. The courts of Alabama affirmed and this Court granted certiorari. In April 1997, Magwood filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge his new death sentence, on grounds that he was not given fair warning at the time of the murder that his crime would warrant a death sentence, and on grounds that his attorney gave ineffective assistance during the resentencing hearing. The Federal District Court conditionally granted his application. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, finding the challenge to be an unreviewable second or successive challenge under § 2244(b). The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Kennedy, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.