Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Mahan v. Avera St. Luke’s

Supreme Court of South Dakota
621 N.W.2d 150 (2001)


Facts

Avera St. Luke’s (ASL) (defendant) was the only private, nonprofit hospital within a 90-mile radius of the small community of Aberdeen, South Dakota. In response to ASL’s only neurosurgeon leaving the hospital, the Board of Directors of ASL (Board) passed a resolution to recruit two neurosurgeons or two “spine-trained” orthopedic surgeons to fill the void. The Board had learned through the recruitment process that having more than one spine-trained surgeon in the small Aberdeen community would pose a significant difficulty on the surgeon’s ability to grow a medical practice. The ASL learned that a local physicians group, Orthopedic Surgery Specialists (OSS) (plaintiff), had decided to build a day surgery center that would directly compete with the ASL. As a result of the new center, the ASL suffered a significant loss of income and hospital operating room usage. In response, the Board passed two motions that precluded any new physician-surgeons from applying for hospital privileges to practice spinal-related procedures. The Board’s decision did not affect those physicians, including OSS surgeons, who already had staff privileges. In making its decision, the Board specifically determined that the staff closures were in the best interests of the Aberdeen community and surrounding area. Dr. Mahan (plaintiff), a spine-trained orthopedic surgeon for the OSS, twice sought medical staff privileges at ASL to perform spine-related procedures. Mahan’s application was denied on both occasions. Mahan, the OSS, and its other physicians brought suit against the ASL challenging the Board’s decision to close the staff and argued that the decision was a breach of medical staff bylaws. Mahan and the OSS requested a permanent injunction requiring the ASL to consider Mahan’s application for privileges. The trial court granted the injunction, finding that the Board had breached the staff bylaws in closing the staff. The ASL appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gilbertson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.