Maher v. City of New Orleans
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
516 F.2d 1051, 5 ELR 20524 (1975)

- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
Maher (plaintiff) brought an action against the City of New Orleans (City) (defendant), seeking declaratory judgment and an injunction against enforcement of the Vieux Carré Ordinance, which regulated the maintenance and preservation of buildings in the French Quarter of the City in an effort to preserve buildings with architectural and historical value. The ordinance stipulated that before any building in the French Quarter could be built, altered, or demolished, the owner must seek and obtain a permit approved by the Vieux Carré Commission. The ordinance also set out the composition, qualifications, duties, and procedures of the commission, as well as review processes for the commission’s decisions. Maher applied to demolish a Victorian cottage on his property in the French Quarter and replace it with an apartment complex. Maher’s attempt to obtain approval for demolition and development of the cottage was denied by the commission several times. Maher appealed to the City Council, but his appeal was denied, and demolition of the cottage was forbidden. Maher sought relief from the federal district court on the grounds that the ordinance violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process because it did not provide an objective criteria by which the commission could make its decisions. The district court ruled in favor of the City, and Maher appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Adams, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.