Maher v. People
Michigan Supreme Court
10 Mich. 212 (1862)
Maher (defendant), believing that his wife and Patrick Hunt were having an affair, followed the pair as they entered the woods together. When Hunt and his wife returned a half hour later, Maher followed Hunt to a saloon. Just prior to entering the saloon, a friend told Maher that his wife and Hunt had sexual intercourse the day before. Maher entered the saloon, approached Hunt, said something unintelligible to him, and shot him in the left ear. Maher was charged with assault with intent to kill. At trial, the judge refused to allow evidence of the facts leading up to the shooting as tending to show proof of provocation. Maher was found guilty and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Christiancy, J.)
Dissent (Manning, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,900 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.