From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
588 F.2d 626 (1978)
Mahlandt (plaintiff) brought suit on behalf of his minor son, Daniel, for injuries Daniel sustained in an alleged attack by a wolf. The wolf was owned by the Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc. (Center) and was being kept at the house of its Director of Education, Kenneth Poos (defendants). Mahlandt sought to introduce into evidence three statements, two made by Poos, and one the minutes of a meeting of the Directors of the Center (Poos did not attend the meeting). The first statement by Poos was a note he left on his boss’s door that said that the wolf bit a child. The second statement was a verbal statement Poos made to his boss that the wolf had bitten a child. The minutes of the Center’s meeting reflect that a significant amount of discussion was held about the legal implications of the wolf biting a child. The trial court excluded all three statements as hearsay, and the jury found in favor of Poos and the Center. Mahlandt appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Van Sickle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.