Mahrenholz v. County Board of School Trustees

417 N.E.2d 138 (1981)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mahrenholz v. County Board of School Trustees

Illinois Appellate Court
417 N.E.2d 138 (1981)

Play video

Facts

In March 1941, the Huttons executed a deed transferring 1.5 acres of their 40-acre plot to the Trustees of School District No. 1 (defendants). The deed provided that the land “was to be used for school purposes only; otherwise to revert to [g]rantors.” The school district built the Hutton School on the land, and classes were taught there through 1973. In 1973, classes were moved to another location, and the Hutton land was used as a storage facility by the school district. In July 1941, the Huttons purported to convey the reversionary interest in the school land to the Jacqmains. In 1959, the Jacqmains purported to convey their interest in the Hutton School land to the Mahrenholzes (plaintiffs). Mr. Hutton died intestate in 1951; Mrs. Hutton died intestate in 1969. Their only heir was Harry Hutton. The Mahrenholzes filed a complaint seeking to quiet title to the Hutton School land in them. The trial court held that the 1941 deed from the Huttons to the school district reserved for the Huttons a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent followed by a right of reentry. Because the Huttons could not legally convey this right to another during their lifetimes, the right passed to their only heir, Harry, upon their deaths. In 1977, Harry purported to convey to the Mahrenholzes his interest in the Hutton School land, but the trial court held that Harry had not successfully regained title of the land because he had not moved to retake the land in 1973 when the land was no longer used as a school, and thus could not have passed title on to the Mahrenholzes. Thus, the trial court dismissed the Mahrenholzes’ complaint seeking to quiet title. The Mahrenholzes appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 798,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership