Mailloux v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

320 F.2d 60 (1963)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mailloux v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
320 F.2d 60 (1963)

Facts

Melvin Mailloux and Robert Foley (plaintiffs) performed services related to the sale of stock and the obtaining of private investments for Rocky Mountain Uranium Corporation. A total of 1.45 million shares were issued in exchange for uranium-mining claims. In addition to commissions, Mailloux and Foley received 120,000 shares each from the principal promoter of the corporation, Critchell Parsons; at the time of receipt, the shares were valued at around $3 per share. All transfer of stock was subject to approval by Parsons. Mailloux and Foley did not report receipt of the shares on their tax returns in the year the shares were received. Parsons prevented Mailloux and Foley from selling shares for a year and a half; Mailloux and Foley subsequently sold the shares for five to 10 cents per share. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) issued an assessment of tax based on the determination that the stock was compensation and valued the stock based on the date of receipt. Mailloux and Foley appealed to the United States Tax Court, contending that the shares were received in exchange for uranium claims. Parsons testified that Mailloux and Foley had no interest in the claims transferred to the corporation. The Tax Court found in favor of the commissioner, and Mailloux and Foley appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, contesting the finding that the shares were not received in a tax-free exchange and also claiming that the shares had a much lower value than the commissioner’s determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership