Maine Rubber International v. Environmental Management Group, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Maine
324 F. Supp. 2d 32 (2004)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Maine Rubber International (plaintiff) planned to relocate its tire-manufacturing business to a new site known as the DuraStone property. Maine Rubber hired Environmental Management Group, Inc. (EMG) (defendant) to perform an environmental study known as a phase-1 assessment on the site. EMG’s inspection found no environmental hazards on the property. Relying on EMG’s inspection report, Maine Rubber proceeded with the purchase of the property. In preparing to relocate, Maine Rubber spent money on engineering studies, site-plan consulting, site studies, legal fees, and other expenses. Later, it was revealed that there were environmental hazards on the DuraStone property. Maine Rubber did not have time to assess or repair the defects prior to completing the transaction. Instead of conducting its planned, orderly relocation to the DuraStone property, Maine Rubber terminated the purchase agreement and hurriedly moved to a different property, incurring higher costs to move, lost profits, and a loss of the expenditures it had made on the DuraStone property. Maine Rubber sued EMG for breach of contract. The jury found EMG in breach and awarded Maine Rubber the parties’ $1,900 contract price, $211,625 for expenses Maine Rubber incurred in anticipation of the move to the DuraStone property, and $486,600 in lost profits. EMG moved for a judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hornby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.