Maizitis v. TUV America, Inc.

2014 WL 2921905 (2014)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maizitis v. TUV America, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
2014 WL 2921905 (2014)

Facts

Maizitis (plaintiff) was promoted to manager by TUV America, Inc. (TUV) (defendant). The parties signed an employment agreement that included a provision barring Maizitis from soliciting employees, vendors, or customers of TUV for a period of two years after his employment ended. On May 22, 2002, Maizitis’s employment was terminated. Maizitis alleged that his belief in the validity of the non-solicitation provision impacted his later employment. TUV never sought to enforce the provision, and it expired in May 2004. Maizitis filed an action against TUV in February 2005, seeking contract damages on the grounds that he had been compelled to enter into and comply with an agreement that was contrary to public policy. Maizitis did not allege any breach of the contract, nor did he present any tort claims or requests for equitable relief. TUV moved the trial court for summary judgment, which the court considered.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Malley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership