Malcolm v. Evenflo Co.
Montana Supreme Court
217 P.3d 514 (2009)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
A friend of Jessica Malcolm (plaintiff) gave her an “On My Way” (OMW) child safety seat prior to giving birth to her son, Tyler. Shortly thereafter, Jessica called the seat’s manufacturer, Evenflo Company (Evenflo) (defendant) to inquire whether the OMW model was safe to use. The company assured Jessica that it was and was not subject to any of their product recalls. While driving her Chevrolet Suburban from town with her sister and Tyler as passengers, Jessica was forced off the road by an oncoming motorist. The Suburban rolled three times, traveled down a steep incline, and came to rest in a ditch. The left belt hook of the OMW seat broke off during the rollover and ejected the OMW from the vehicle. The seat came to rest about 60 feet from the vehicle. Although Tyler remained strapped in the OMW, he suffered severe brain injuries which resulted in his subsequent death. Jessica and her husband, Chad, (plaintiff) filed a strict products liability suit against Evenflo claiming the OMW seat contained a design defect that caused Tyler’s death. At trial, the Malcolms argued that the OMW’s open-ended belt hook design and the lack of expanded polystyrene padding contributed to Tyler’s death and contended that Evenflo could have manufactured the seat using a feasible superior alternative design. Conversely, Evenflo claimed that the child safety seat was not defective in any way and that the particular OMW model had passed each of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) tests conducted on the seat. The trial court granted the Malcolm’s motion in limine to exclude arguments by Evenflo that the OMW complied with the FMVSS tests reasoning that such compliance was not relevant to the design defect claim. The jury held for the Malcolms and awarded over $6.5 million in compensatory damages. Evenflo appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Morris, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.