Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Maldonado v. U.S. Bank and Manufacturers Bank

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
186 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 1999)


Facts

In early 1997, Jessica Maldonado (plaintiff) was hired as a part-time teller at U.S. Bank and Manufacturers Bank (the Bank) (defendant). Part-time tellers performed the same duties as full-time tellers and were required to be available six days per week to fill in for absent full-time tellers. During the interview process, Maldonado’s supervisor, Amalia Gonzalez, informed Maldonado that the Bank’s need for part-time tellers peaked during the summer months when more full-time tellers were on vacation. Three days after Maldonado’s interview, she discovered she was pregnant and due in July. Shortly thereafter, on February 20, Maldonado began the training course at the Bank to become a part-time teller. While still in training, on March 3, Maldonado informed Gonzalez that she was pregnant. Gonzalez fired Maldonado the following day. Maldonado sued the Bank under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k), alleging that she was wrongfully terminated because of her pregnancy. At trial, Maldonado testified that Gonzalez explicitly told her that the firing was “due to [Maldonado’s] condition.” The Bank did not dispute that Maldonado was fired due to her pregnancy, but argued that it was permissible, because Maldonado’s pregnancy, if carried to term, would make her unavailable in the summer months and thus unable to perform the job for which she was hired. The district court granted summary judgment in the Bank’s favor. Maldonado appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.