Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. v. Oceanografia, S.A. de C.V.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
817 F.3d 241, 2016 AMC 1084 (2016)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. (Malin) (plaintiff) operated a shipyard in Galveston, Texas. Malin performed work for Oceanografia, S.A. de C.V. (OSA) (defendant), but OSA failed to pay Malin for that work. Malin sued OSA in federal district court for breach of contract and quantum meruit. OSA operated the Kestrel, a vessel owned by Cal Dive Offshore Contractors, Inc., under a bareboat-charter agreement. The charter agreement stated that OSA would purchase the fuel in the fuel bunkers at the time of delivery of the vessel. OSA took delivery of the vessel on October 15, 2012. To obtain jurisdiction over OSA pursuant to Supplemental Admiralty Rule B, Malin had the fuel bunkers aboard the Kestrel attached on October 29, 2012. OSA filed a motion claiming that it did not hold an attachable interest in the bunkers because it did not have title to them. The district court denied the motion, holding that OSA’s possessory interest in the bunkers was an attachable interest, and granted Malin’s motion for summary judgment. OSA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.