From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
Malone v. United States Postal Service
United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
833 F.2d 128 (1987)
Ann Malone (plaintiff) sued the United States Postal Service (Government) (defendant), for violating her civil rights. The matter went to trial in November 1984. After Malone’s attorney presented her case in a disorderly fashion, the judge declared a mistrial. Subsequently, the court issued a pretrial order requiring both parties to identify all witnesses and provide a list of all direct questions and expected responses by April 25, 1985. The court stated that no oral argument or continuances would be allowed with respect to the order. Trial was set to begin in June. The Government worked to comply with the order. Malone’s attorney, on the other hand, informed the Government on April 23 that Malone would not comply. On April 26, Malone objected to the order, requested the judge’s recusal, and sought a continuance. The Government moved to dismiss Malone’s case. At a hearing on May 16, Malone’s attorney stated that she lacked the financial resources to comply with the order. The judge was unconvinced, given other discovery expenditures made by Malone. The court dismissed Malone’s case with prejudice. Malone appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Choy, J.)
Dissent (Tang, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 586,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 586,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.