Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Malonis v. Harrington

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
816 N.E.2d 115 (2004)


Marc Loiselle was injured in a vehicle accident in which the other vehicle was driven by an employee of Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. Loiselle retained attorney George Malonis (plaintiff) to represent him in a personal injury suit against Browning-Ferris. Loiselle and Malonis agreed to a contingent fee arrangement through which Malonis was to receive one-third of the amount recovered. Malonis performed legal work for Loiselle in this matter for approximately two and one-half years, including completing discovery, performing depositions, and negotiating with Browning-Ferris. While Malonis and Browning-Ferris were in settlement discussions, Loiselle discharged Malonis and retained attorney Robert Harrington under a similar contingent fee arrangement. Malonis forwarded his case files to Harrington and notified Loiselle, Harrington, and Browning-Ferris that he intended to establish an attorney’s lien on any recovery in the case. Approximately six months later, Harrington reached a settlement with Browning-Ferris for $57,500, with $40,000 going to Loiselle and $17,500 to Harrington for his contingency fee. Harrington assured Browning-Ferris’s counsel that he would take care of Malonis’s attorney’s lien. Malonis sent Harrington an itemized statement for his work and expenses totaling approximately $11,000. Harrington responded that Malonis’s claimed fee was ridiculous and refused to pay. Malonis filed a complaint in superior court against Loiselle and Harrington to recover his fee. The superior court held that all parties had expected Harrington would pay Malonis’s attorney’s fees from Harrington’s contingent fees and held Harrington liable for Malonis’s fees. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court transferred the case on its own motion to review the judgment.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Greaney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial