Manches & Co. v. Gilbey
Massachusetts Supreme Court
419 Mass. 414, 646 N.E.2d 86 (1995)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Manches & Co. (Manches) (plaintiff) was a London firm of solicitors that brought an action against Suzanne Gilbey and Peter Thornton, claiming that Gilbey and Thornton were liable for legal services rendered to Gilbey in England after the death of her father. On August 22, 1992, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice in London entered a default judgment in favor of Manches for £30,138.35. On November 2, 1992, Manches commenced an action in superior court in Massachusetts to enforce Massachusetts’s version of the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act. The Massachusetts court granted summary judgment in favor of Manches. The judge entered judgment in dollars using the exchange rate between the British pound and the American dollar at the time summary judgment was granted. Manches appealed and disputed the amount of the judgment that was entered. Manches argued that the judge should have used the exchange rate at the date that the judgment was entered in London because the British pound declined in relation to the American dollar from the date of the London judgment to the date of the Massachusetts judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
