Maness v. Collins
Tennessee Court of Appeals
No. W2008-00941-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 4629614 (2010)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Sammie Maness (plaintiff) owned and operated SKM Wood, Products, LLC, a wood-manufacturing business. An acquaintance of Maness, Joannie Collins (defendant), approached him with an offer to purchase the business for $1.3 million. Maness agreed, and the parties executed an asset-purchase agreement (the agreement). The new owners of the business, called SKM, LLC (defendant), included Collins serving as the accountant, Collins’s brother-in-law, Mike Smith (defendant), working part-time, and Smith’s son, Josh Smith (defendant) (collectively, the new owners), managing the day-to-day operations. Maness entered into a three-year employment contract with SKM to serve as its production manager. Additionally, Maness signed a noncompetition agreement. After a few months, it became well-known at SKM that Josh Smith had a drug-addiction problem and often undercut Maness’s authority with the employees. After Maness fired an employee for unprofessionalism, Smith admonished Maness and rehired the employee. Thereafter, Maness often sat in his office doing very little work. Shortly thereafter, Maness was fired by SKM for failing to fulfill his job duties. Maness spent the next year building a house and did not seek alternative employment. Instead, Maness filed suit against the new owners for breach of the employment agreement and a declaration that the noncompetition agreement was invalid. The trial court held that the parties failed to produce any evidence regarding the validity of the noncompetition agreement; that the new owners lacked just cause in firing Maness; and that Maness failed to mitigate his damages. Consequently, the court awarded no damages payable to Maness. Maness appealed, and the new owners cross-appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kirby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.