Maniaci v. Marquette University

184 N.W.2d 168 (1971)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maniaci v. Marquette University

Wisconsin Supreme Court
184 N.W.2d 168 (1971)

SC

Facts

Saralee Maniaci (plaintiff) was a freshman at Marquette University (Marquette) (defendant). Maniaci did not like the school and wanted to withdraw, so she bought a train ticket home and began packing. When notice of Maniaci’s pending departure reached Marquette administration, Dean of Women Mary Alice Cannon and Assistant Dean of Women Patricia Watson (defendants) went to Maniaci’s dorm room but were unable to convince Maniaci to stay. Dr. Dean Miller, a Marquette doctor, also came to talk with Maniaci. Cannon and Watson tried to call Maniaci’s father numerous times but could not reach him. Miller suggested that Maniaci be institutionalized for mental evaluation. Cannon and Watson agreed and filled out an Application for Temporary Custody (Application) under a Wisconsin statute that permitted emergency temporary detention of individuals who are irresponsible and dangerous. The police then took Maniaci to the mental ward of a hospital. When Maniaci’s father was finally reached, Maniaci was released from the hospital. Maniaci brought suit against the defendants for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The trial court dismissed the malicious-prosecution claim and found in favor of Maniaci on the false-imprisonment claim. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heffernan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms