From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Manicki v. Zeilmann
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
443 F.3d 922 (2006)
Mark Manicki (plaintiff), a police officer in his one-year probationary period for the City of Ottawa, Illinois (City) (defendant), witnessed a fight between two other officers. The fight was started by an officer favored by the police chief, Brian Zeilmann (defendant), who told Manicki to inform criminal investigators that both officers were equally at fault. When Manicki refused to change his statement, Zeilmann wrote to the City’s Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (Board), stating that Manicki had failed to perform adequately during his probationary period and should be fired. The Board fired Manicki without a hearing. Manicki sued the Board and Zeilmann in Illinois state court, contending that the Board violated his right to due process by failing to hold a hearing in light of Zeilmann’s retaliatory letter. The Illinois court decided in favor of the Board and Zeilmann. Manicki then filed a lawsuit in a federal district court against Zeilmann and the City, alleging that Zeilmann’s retaliatory conduct violated Manicki’s First Amendment rights. The district court dismissed Manicki’s case on the basis of res judicata. Manicki appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.