Mann v. Columbia Pictures, Warren Beatty and Robert Towne
California Court of Appeal
128 Cal. App. 3d 628, 180 Cal. Rptr. 522 (1982)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Bernice Mann (plaintiff) wrote an outline for a motion picture entitled Women Plus and registered the work with the Writers Guild of America. Through a mutual friend, Mann submitted Women Plus and one other work to an employee of Columbia Pictures (defendant). However, the employee never submitted it to Columbia and instead gave the two submissions to a story editor at the company Filmmakers. Filmmakers rejected the other submission via letter but never explicitly rejected Women Plus. Years later, Columbia released the film Shampoo. Mann filed suit against Columbia and the film writers, Warren Beatty and Robert Towne (defendants). Mann alleged that her submission amounted to an implied-in-fact contract. At trial, Beatty and Towne gave uncontroverted testimony that they never had access to Women Plus. Nevertheless, a jury found similarities between the films and awarded Mann $185,000. On defense counsel’s motion, the trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and found that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding. Mann appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stephens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.