Supreme Court of New Jersey
255 A.2d 258 (1969)
Gorski (defendant) and the Mannillos (plaintiffs) were landowners with property adjacent to each other. Prior to the Mannillos’ acquisition of their land, Gorski installed a set of steps leading to a side entrance of her home. These steps encroached by 15 inches upon the lot that the Mannillos later purchased. Upon discovering this encroachment, the Mannillos brought suit for an injunction. The trial court determined that even though her possession was “exclusive, continuous, uninterrupted, visible, notorious and against the right and interest of the true owner" for more than twenty years, Gorski did not acquire the fifteen inches by adverse possession, because Gorski did not possess the hostile intent required by New Jersey law. The court granted the Mannillos an injunction. Gorski petitioned for certification to the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Haneman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.