Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.

377 F. Supp. 2d 444 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
377 F. Supp. 2d 444 (2005)

Play video

Facts

Jonathan Mannion (plaintiff) was hired to photograph an athlete, Kevin Garnett, for a spread in SLAM magazine. One of the photographs ultimately featured in the spread was distinctive in its combination of all-white athletic clothing and distinctive jewelry, as well as its pose, camera angle, lighting, and background. Mannion had instructed Garnett on what kind of clothing and accessories to wear and how to pose. However, Garnett selected the specific items to wear to meet Mannion’s requests. Carol H. Williams Advertising (CHWA) (defendant) was hired by Coors Brewing Company (Coors) (defendant) to create billboard ads for Coors Light beer. CHWA obtained permission to use Mannion’s photograph in a comp-board image when pitching billboards to Coors. However, when the final billboard was made, CHWA used another photographer to create an image that was substantially the same with respect to the subject’s clothing and accessories, pose, camera angle, lighting, and background. Mannion saw the billboard and brought suit for copyright infringement. Both parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership