Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Mansell v. Mansell

United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 581 (1989)


Facts

Retired members of the armed forces can be eligible for a pension. In addition, members of the armed forces who are disabled as a result of their service can be entitled to disability benefits in relation to the extent of the disability. However, a retiree cannot receive both in full. A retiree can receive disability benefits only to the extent the retiree waives an equivalent amount of retirement benefits. The Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act permitted state courts to treat “disposable retired or retainer pay” as community property. The act excluded from this definition retirement pay waived for purposes of receiving disability pay. Major Gerald Mansell (the husband) (plaintiff), a retired member of the Air Force, and Gaye Mansell (the wife) (defendant) were divorced. The husband received military retirement benefits, and, offset by a waiver of a portion of his retirement pay, military disability benefits. The divorce decree ordered the husband to pay the wife 50 percent of his total retirement pay, including that portion the husband waived in order to receive disability pay. The husband petitioned the superior court to modify the decree to eliminate the requirement that he split his total retirement pay, including that portion waived, with the wife. The superior court denied the petition. The California Court of Appeal affirmed, rejecting the husband’s act-based argument. The Supreme Court of California denied review. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (O’Connor, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.