Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District

76 Misc. 2d 1080, 352 N.Y.S.2d 784 (1974)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District

New York Supreme Court
76 Misc. 2d 1080, 352 N.Y.S.2d 784 (1974)

Facts

Maple Farms, Inc. (plaintiff) signed an agreement with City School District (the school district) (defendant) on June 15, 1973, in which Maple Farms agreed to sell milk to the school district for the 1973–1974 school year. Nothing in the contract said that Maple Farms could adjust the agreement based on rising prices of raw milk. From June 15, 1973, to December 1973, the price of raw milk increased by 23 percent, which was a more significant price change than in the previous few years. At the time the contract was signed, there had been a 10 percent increase in the price of raw milk from the previous year’s lowest price. The sudden increase in price could be attributed in large part to sales of massive amounts of grain by the United States to Russia, and in smaller part to poor crop yields. Because of the sudden and significant price increase, Maple Farms asked the school district to release it from the contract so that Maple Farms could bid for new buyers at the increased price, but the school district refused. Maple Farms calculated that it would have a loss of $7,350.55 on the sales to the school district at the agreed-upon price. Maple Farms filed an action for declaratory judgment, asking the court to rule that the contract could be terminated on grounds that performance of the contract was impossible or impracticable because of unforeseen changes in circumstances.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Swartwood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership