Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Maples v. Thomas

565 U.S. 266 (2012)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Maples v. Thomas

United States Supreme Court

565 U.S. 266 (2012)

Play video

Facts

In 1997, Cory R. Maples (plaintiff) was sentenced to death for murder in Alabama. Maples sought postconviction relief in state court on grounds that he had been given ineffective assistance of counsel. Two attorneys at a New York law firm represented Maples in his application for postconviction relief. Because the attorneys were barred in another jurisdiction, they associated with local counsel, John Butler, on condition that they handle all substantive issues of the case. In 2002, the two attorneys left the New York law firm, which precluded them from representing Maples. Neither attorney notified Maples or the trial court. In May 2003, the Alabama trial court denied the petition for postconviction relief. Notice of the denial was sent to the two attorneys but was returned to the clerk of the court. The clerk did not attempt to mail the notices again. Butler received the notice but he did not take any action because he believed the New York attorneys received the notice and would act accordingly. Consequently, the time to appeal lapsed. Maples later filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court. The petition was denied. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed, due to Maples’ failure to appeal the Alabama trial court’s denial of postconviction relief.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership