Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Maples v. Thomas

United States Supreme Court
132 S. Ct. 912 (2012)


Facts

In 1997, Cory R. Maples (plaintiff) was sentenced to death for murder in Alabama. Maples sought postconviction relief in state court on grounds that he had been given ineffective assistance of counsel. Two attorneys at a New York law firm represented Maples in his application for postconviction relief. Because the attorneys were barred in another jurisdiction, they associated with local counsel, John Butler, on condition that they handle all substantive issues of the case. In 2002, the two attorneys left the New York law firm, which precluded them from representing Maples. Neither attorney notified Maples or the trial court. In May 2003, the Alabama trial court denied the petition for postconviction relief. Notice of the denial was sent to the two attorneys but was returned to the clerk of the court. The clerk did not attempt to mail the notices again. Butler received the notice but he did not take any action because he believed the New York attorneys received the notice and would act accordingly. Consequently, the time to appeal lapsed. Maples later filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court. The petition was denied. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed, due to Maples’ failure to appeal the Alabama trial court’s denial of postconviction relief.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.