Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi
California Supreme Court
42 Cal. 4Th 974 (2008)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Actress Rosa Blasi (defendant) entered into an oral contract with Marathon Entertainment, Inc. (Marathon) (plaintiff) for Marathon to act as Blasi’s personal manager. Pursuant to this relationship, Marathon made several attempts to procure employment for Blasi. Blasi secured a lead role in the TV series Strong Medicine, after which she reduced Marathon’s commission from 15 percent to 10 percent and then terminated the contract altogether. Marathon brought suit to recover unpaid commissions as a personal manager in connection with Blasi’s Strong Medicine role. Blasi obtained a stay of the action and filed a petition with the labor commissioner. Blasi alleged that Marathon had violated the Talent Agencies Act by procuring professional engagements for Blasi—an activity limited to licensed agents, as opposed to managers—thus voiding the entire contract between Blasi and Marathon. The labor commissioner agreed. Marathon appealed, and the case went back to court. The trial court granted summary judgment for Blasi and voided the contract. Marathon appealed. The appellate court found that Blasi had failed to prove that Marathon had illegally procured the Strong Medicine job. The appellate court further reasoned that severability of contracts applied, allowing Marathon to recover commissions for services rendered lawfully under the contract. The California Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.