Marchand v. Town of Hudson

147 N.H. 380, 788 A.2d 250 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marchand v. Town of Hudson

New Hampshire Supreme Court
147 N.H. 380, 788 A.2d 250 (2001)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Muller was an amateur ham radio operator who resided in a residential section in the Town of Hudson (the town) (defendant). Muller applied for a building permit to erect three 90-foot amateur radio towers, which would eventually have 10-foot antennae added to them. Muller’s neighbors Suzanne Marchand, Joanne Radziewicz, and Peter Radziewicz (the neighbors) (plaintiffs) opposed the erection of the radio towers. The neighbors appealed the grant of Muller’s building permit to the town’s zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) and argued that radio communications towers were not permitted in the residential zone. ZBA found that ham radio was an accessory use in residential districts in the town and upheld the grant of Muller’s building permit. The neighbors requested a rehearing, and the ZBA upheld its decision. The neighbors then appealed to the superior court. The superior court reversed the ZBA decision, rescinded the building permits, and ordered that the towers be removed. The town appealed and argued that the building permit was properly issued as an accessory use and that the superior court’s ordered relief conflicted with federal objectives to promote amateur communications.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brock, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership