Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Marcy v. Delta Airlines

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
166 F.3d 1279 (9th Cir. 1999)


Facts

Beginning in 1987, Suzanne Marcy (plaintiff) was employed by Delta Airlines (Delta) (defendant) at a facility in Montana. Marcy was generally considered to be an outstanding employee. In May 1993, Marcy submitted a payroll document containing three mistakes that would have resulted in her receiving $250 in unearned wages. When Delta confronted Marcy about the discrepancies, Marcy explained that the incorrect entries were due to honest mistakes and that she did not have a chance to check the document for mistakes. Marcy had not been concerned about being unable to check the document, because mistakes were common in Delta’s payroll system and Delta’s practice was to consult with employees about any discrepancies. As a result of the mistakes and a prior incident of fraud in which Marcy had falsified telephone logs to make personal long-distance phone calls, Delta terminated Marcy’s employment. Marcy sued Delta in state court for wrongful discharge under Montana’s Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA). Delta removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Montana. A jury determined that Marcy’s errors were unintentional and that Delta had therefore wrongfully discharged Marcy under the WDEA. Delta moved for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative for a new trial, on the ground that Marcy had not shown Delta acted in bad faith. The district court denied the motions. Delta appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Boochever, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Graber, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.