Marcy v. Delta Airlines
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
166 F.3d 1279 (1999)
Beginning in 1987, Suzanne Marcy (plaintiff) was employed by Delta Airlines (Delta) (defendant) at a facility in Montana. Marcy was generally considered to be an outstanding employee. In May 1993, Marcy submitted a payroll document containing three mistakes that would have resulted in her receiving $250 in unearned wages. When Delta confronted Marcy about the discrepancies, Marcy explained that the incorrect entries were due to honest mistakes and that she did not have a chance to check the document for mistakes. Marcy had not been concerned about being unable to check the document, because mistakes were common in Delta’s payroll system and Delta’s practice was to consult with employees about any discrepancies. As a result of the mistakes and a prior incident of fraud in which Marcy had falsified telephone logs to make personal long-distance phone calls, Delta terminated Marcy’s employment. Marcy sued Delta in state court for wrongful discharge under Montana’s Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA). Delta removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Montana. A jury determined that Marcy’s errors were unintentional and that Delta had therefore wrongfully discharged Marcy under the WDEA. Delta moved for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative for a new trial, on the ground that Marcy had not shown Delta acted in bad faith. The district court denied the motions. Delta appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Boochever, J.)
Dissent (Graber, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.