Supreme Court of Indiana
10 N.E.2d 917 (1937)
In 1883, some passersby discovered the entrance to what is now Marengo Cave. The Marengo Cave Company (Marengo) (defendant) succeeded the discoverers in title to the land on which the cave entrance was located, and it controlled the entrance and operated the cave as a tourist attraction. Marengo made improvements, such as building walkways and widening paths, and charged visitors admission fees. Ross (plaintiff) was an adjacent landowner. The entrance to the cave was 700 feet from the boundary between Ross and Marengo’s land, but a substantial portion of the cave itself was under Ross’s land. Ross sued Marengo to quiet title in the portion of the cave beneath his land. Marengo argued that it had acquired title to the entire cave by adverse possession. The boundaries of the cave as it related to the ground surface was not ascertained until 1932, when the trial court in the instant matter ordered a survey. A jury trial returned a verdict for Ross, and the court denied Marengo’s motion for a new trial. Marengo appealed the decision to deny the motion on the ground that the jury verdict was not sustained by sufficient evidence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roll, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.