Margarite v. Ewald

381 A.2d 480 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Margarite v. Ewald

Pennsylvania Superior Court
381 A.2d 480 (1977)

Play video

Facts

A deed conveyed property to “John Ewald and Mary B. Ewald his wife and Joseph Ewald . . . as tenants in common with the right of survivorship.” Mary died intestate, leaving John and her son Mario Margarite (plaintiff) as her sole heirs at law. John Ewald died about a year later, bequeathing his entire estate to George Ewald (defendant). Joseph Ewald (defendant), the third grantee in the original conveyance, was still living. Margarite petitioned for an interpretation of the deed to ascertain his interest, if any, in the subject property. The trial court held that the deed created a tenancy in common that gave each grantee a one-third interest. Thus Mary’s one-third interest was divided between John Ewald and Margarite, giving the latter a one-sixth interest. On appeal, Joseph and George Ewald argued that the deed created between John and Mary a tenancy by the entirety, which should have given John, and in turn George, an undivided one-half interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership