Margate Shipping Co. v. M/V JA Orgeron
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
143 F.3d 976, 1998 AMC 2383 (1998)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The tug JA Orgeron (defendant) was towing the barge Poseidon, which was carrying an external fuel tank for a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) space shuttle, when the vessels became endangered in a severe storm off the coast of Florida. The Orgeron lost engine power, and the tug and barge were adrift and being carried toward dangerous shoals. The weather was so severe that the United States Coast Guard was unable to deploy any assistance. The M/V Cherry Valley, a fully loaded oil tanker, heard the Orgeron’s distress call and proceeded, at great risk to itself and its crew, to the Orgeron’s aid. Through truly courageous and extraordinary efforts, the Cherry Valley managed to save the Orgeron, the Poseidon, the valuable fuel-tank cargo, and itself intact and unharmed through the duration of the storm. The fuel tank was later used by NASA in a successful space-shuttle launch. The owner of the Cherry Valley, Margate Shipping Co. (Margate) (plaintiff) brought a claim for salvage against the Orgeron, with the United States (defendant) later added on a crossclaim. After Margate’s claims against the Orgeron were settled, the claim against the United States went to trial. The trial judge awarded Margate $6.4 million, and the United States appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jolly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.