Marjorie Rowland v. Mad River Local School District

730 F.2d 444 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marjorie Rowland v. Mad River Local School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
730 F.2d 444 (1985)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Marjorie Rowland (plaintiff) worked as a high school guidance counselor within the Mad River Local School District (the school district) (defendant). Rowland filed an action in federal district court against the school district and multiple school officials. Rowland alleged that she had been suspended and did not receive a contract renewal after she disclosed to other employees that she was bisexual. Rowland argued that the district had violated her equal-protection rights granted by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and her free-speech rights granted by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. A jury found that the school district had taken adverse employment action against Rowland because she had disclosed her sexual orientation, but that Rowland had also behaved unprofessionally by revealing to employees the names of students who had disclosed to her that they were gay. Following the jury’s findings, the district court held that the school district had violated Rowland’s equal-protection rights and free-speech rights by suspending her and not renewing her contract. The matter was appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lively, C.J.)

Dissent (Edwards, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership