Markey v. Jonathan Club
California Court of Appeal
2002 WL 1904416 (2002)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
The Jonathan Club (the club) (defendant) was a nonprofit mutual-benefit corporation that operated a beach facility in Santa Monica for social and recreational purposes. Christian E. Markey III (plaintiff) was a member of the club. In December 1997, an incident occurred between Markey and three minor girls. Two police reports were filed, and three misdemeanor counts of annoying or molesting a minor were charged against Markey. Markey pleaded no contest to the charges and was placed on probation for three years. Additionally, Markey was ordered to pay restitution to the victims, have no contact with the girls, and undergo psychological testing. Under state law, a no-contest plea to misdemeanor charges could not be legally used as an admission of guilt in any civil suit or administrative hearing. In due course, the club notified Markey that the board of directors had decided to expel him from the club, considering the facts and circumstances of the incident, the location, and the outcome. The club’s bylaws allowed the expulsion of any member for conduct that was “prejudicial to the best interests, welfare, character, and reputation” of the club. Markey was given proper notice of an expulsion hearing. Prior to the hearing, Markey submitted a 25-page letter to the board explaining his reasons for opposing the proposed expulsion. At the hearing, which occurred before a three-member committee of the board, Markey was represented by counsel. Subsequently, Markey sent another letter to the board stating his contentions. Thereafter, the board voted unanimously to terminate Markey’s membership. Markey sued the club seeking to compel reinstatement of his membership. The trial court denied relief. Markey appealed, arguing that he did not receive a fair expulsion procedure, that he was unreasonably expelled, and that the club improperly used his no-contest plea.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.