Marrero-Gutierrez v. Molina
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
491 F.3d 1 (2007)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Enid Marrero-Gutierrez and Alejandro Bou Santiago (public employees) (plaintiffs) were former employees of the Housing Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and active members of the New Progressive Party (NPP). The public employees brought suit against the housing department and a number of its employees (defendants) for political discrimination, various violations of the constitution, and state-law claims. The public employees alleged that both were terminated from their positions with the housing department after the Popular Democratic Party (PDP), the political adversary of the NPP, won control of the Puerto Rican government and overhauled the housing department. The housing department successfully moved to dismiss the claims against it on Eleventh Amendment grounds. The public employees did not appeal this ruling. Thereafter, upon motions filed by both parties, the district court granted the housing department’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, raising the defense of failure to state a claim. The public employees appealed, arguing that the district court erred in allowing the housing department’s motion for judgment on the pleadings because the housing department had waived the grounds upon which the district court relied, by failing to consolidate its defenses and raise them in the first motion to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.