Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
726 F.2d 1150 (1984)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Dr. Anthony Marrese and Dr. Michael Treister (plaintiffs) were orthopedic surgeons who applied for membership in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (academy) (defendant), a voluntary private professional association. The academy denied the doctors’ applications without providing a hearing or explaining the reasons for denial. The doctors sued the academy in Illinois state court, alleging that the academy was required to hold a hearing on their applications. The state court dismissed the complaint. The doctors then brought an antitrust action against the academy in federal district court, alleging that the academy had a monopoly in the orthopedic-surgery market and had refused the doctors’ membership applications because the doctors competed too aggressively with other academy members. During pretrial discovery, the doctors requested all files pertaining to the academy’s denial of membership applications between 1970 and 1980. The academy refused to produce the materials. The district court ordered the academy to produce the materials subject to a protective order that allowed the doctors to view their own application files and allowed the doctors’ lawyers to view all the membership materials and depose anyone named in them. The academy refused to comply. The district court held the academy in criminal contempt for violating the discovery order and fined the academy $10,000. The academy appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
Dissent (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.