Marriage of Anderson
Court of Appeal of California
28 Cal. App. 4th 873 (1994)
In May 1986, Elizabeth Andersen (plaintiff) filed a standard form petition for dissolution of marriage from Conrad Anderson (defendant). Elizabeth checked the box on the petition indicating that assets and obligations would be listed in the property declaration filed along with the petition. Elizabeth also checked the box requesting that the court determine the parties’ respective property rights. Elizabeth listed 10 items as community assets and listed several creditors as debts. Elizabeth did not list values for the assets or debts. Further, Elizabeth did not request the court to divide the property in any particular manner. In 1987, a default judgment was entered against Conrad. In 1988, Conrad moved to set aside the judgment. The trial court denied Conrad’s motion but ruled that the judgment gave Elizabeth more relief than Elizabeth originally requested in the petition. A new judgment was entered in 1989. In 1991, orders were filed that provided an in-kind division of the Andersons' community assets and liabilities. The court ordered Conrad to pay $9,916.50 as an equalizing payment to Elizabeth. In August 1991, Conrad moved to set aside the default judgment and the orders filed in 1991. The trial court denied Conrad’s motion. Conrad appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (DiBiaso, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.