Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Marriage of Benson

Supreme Court of California
116 P.3d 1152 (2005)


Facts

Douglas Benson (defendant) and Diane Benson (plaintiff) were married. Diane filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage. Douglas worked full-time and had a 401(k) retirement account through his employer. Diane’s father initially owned the house in which the couple lived. Diane’s father deeded the couple a 100 percent ownership interest in the house. Diane’s father later requested that the house be deeded to Diane’s irrevocable trust, of which her father was the trustee. According to Douglas, he agreed to transfer ownership of the house to the trust, but only upon a verbal commitment from Diane that she would give up any interest in Douglas’s retirement accounts. The agreement was never reduced to writing, and at trial Diane denied making the agreement. Douglas separately settled his claim regarding his interest in the house. Diane argued that the claimed transmutation of Douglas’s retirement accounts was invalid due to section 852(a) of the California Family Code. Section 852(a) provided that a transmutation of community property must be made expressly in writing. The trial court found that Douglas deeding the house to the trust was part performance of the oral transmutation agreement, rendering the agreement enforceable against Diane. The court of appeal affirmed. Diane appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Moreno, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.