Marriage of Geraci

51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 234 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marriage of Geraci

California Court of Appeal
51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 234 (2006)

SC

Facts

In 1973, John Geraci (defendant) bought a house for $43,000. In 1980, John razed the house and built a new house. Also in 1980, John and Jane Geraci (plaintiff) began living together in the new house. In 1983, the parties got married. Over the course of the marriage, the parties refinanced the house or took out a home equity loan six times. In 2000, the couple separated and sold the house for $974,000, $354,000 of which constituted net gain. The couple split this amount, with Jane keeping $159,000 and John keeping $194,000. In 2001, Jane filed for dissolution of the marriage. John presented evidence that the house had a fair market value of $400,000 when John and Jane got married. Based on that, John sought an order permitting him to keep the entire $354,000 from the sale. There was no evidence of John’s equity in the property at the time the house was built. The trial court ruled against John and enforced the parties’ pre-dissolution split of the sale proceeds.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership