Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Marriage of Jacobson

Court of Appeals of California
207 Cal. Rptr. 512 (1984)


Facts

Mrs. Jacobson (plaintiff) filed for divorce from Mr. Jacobson (defendant) on June 11, 1980, after 15 years of marriage. Mr. Jacobson was an active-duty military member who resided in Iowa but was located in California as a result of his military service. On June 30, 1980, Mr. Jacobson filed a motion to dismiss the California divorce action on the grounds of forum non conveniens and lack of consent. On July 1, 1980, Mr. and Mrs. Jacobson signed a handwritten consent decree, which was filed with the commissioner and provided, in pertinent part, that Mr. Jacobson agreed to have the case resolved under California law. On November 25, 1980, during the proceedings, Mr. and Mrs. Jacobson signed a second stipulation expressly stating that the court was to reserve jurisdiction over Mr. Jacobson's military pension. In 1983, Mr. Jacobson became eligible to receive his military pension, although he did not retire. Mrs. Jacobson filed an action to divide Mr. Jacobson's pension. Mr. Jacobson claimed that the trial court did not have jurisdiction either to apply California law or to determine that his military pension was community property. The trial court made factual determinations and a legal division of Mr. Jacobson's pension. Mr. Jacobson appealed the trial court's decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.