California Supreme Court
531 P.2d 420 (1975)
Sumiko Jones (plaintiff) and Herschel Jones (defendant) were married in 1964. Herschel had been in military service since 1957 but became fully disabled through the loss of a limb in 1969. Herschel was discharged with disability pay of $379.12 per month. Herschel had no vested right in any retirement pay, and his payments were entirely based upon his disability. The parties were divorced in 1972, and Sumiko petitioned the trial court to find that Herschel's lifetime disability payments were a community-property asset. The trial court determined that there was no community-property interest in Herschel's disability payments received after the marriage and denied Sumiko's petition. Sumiko appealed the trial court's decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.