Marriage of Steinberger
California Court of Appeal
91 Cal.App.4th 1449 (2001)
Buff Jones (plaintiff) and James Steinberger (defendant) were married in 1988. Buff and James filed for divorce in December 1998. One of the matters handled during the trial was the appropriate designation of a ring that James had given to Buff as either separate or community property. While they were married, James and Buff bought a loose diamond using community-property funds. James made a ring for Buff using this diamond and gave her the ring after their fifth anniversary, along with a card. The card merely congratulated Buff on a promotion and also mentioned their five years of marriage. James testified at trial that the ring was considered both a gift and an investment in their community property. Buff testified that she was aware the ring was of substantial value and that she considered the ring a gift. The trial court found the ring to be Buff’s separate property. James appealed the trial court’s ruling regarding the designation of the ring as Buff’s separate property because there was no written transmutation regarding the ring as required by section 852 of the California Family Code.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cottle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.