Marriage of Tammen
Court of Appeal of California
63 Cal. App. 3d 927 (1976)
- Written by Jacqueline (Hagan) Doyer, JD
Facts
Richard (defendant) and Elizabeth (plaintiff) Tammen filed for dissolution of marriage. In the judgment dividing the community property, the trial court awarded Elizabeth approximately 79 percent of the community property. In order to ensure that the division of community property was even between Richard and Elizabeth, the trial court ordered Elizabeth to execute a promissory note to Richard for $19,820.80. The promissory note was to be secured by a trust deed on the family residence. The family residence was awarded to Elizabeth in the dissolution proceeding. The promissory note and interest on the promissory note would become payable after 10 years passed, Elizabeth remarried, the family residence was sold, the family residence was refinanced, Elizabeth stopped living in the family residence, or when Elizabeth died, whichever happened first. The promissory note was also subject to a lien for $18,497.12. Richard appealed the trial court’s order.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Elknigton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.