Marriage of Urbana
Washington Court of Appeals
195 P.3d 959 (2008)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
Elizabeth Urbana (plaintiff) had two daughters from a previous marriage when she married Robert Urbana (defendant). Elizabeth and Robert then had a son, A.R.U. Elizabeth learned that Robert had sexually assaulted her two daughters, and she filed for divorce. Robert was convicted of child sexual abuse and sentenced to more than eight years in prison. When the divorce matter went to trial, Robert was earning $0.34 per hour for prison labor. The trial court found, among other things, that Robert could not pay child support for A.R.U. and thus the court could not enter a child-support order. Stating that Elizabeth had to support herself and three children, the trial court awarded an 80 percent share of the community property to Elizabeth and a 20 percent share to Robert. The trial court’s decree resulted in a patent disparity between the economic circumstances of Robert and Elizabeth. Robert appealed, arguing, among other things, that the trial court improperly included an award of child support in the division of community property.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Van Deren, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

