Marriage of Witherspoon

155 Cal. App. 4th 963, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marriage of Witherspoon

California Court of Appeal
155 Cal. App. 4th 963, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586 (2007)

Facts

Danny Witherspoon (plaintiff) and Julie Witherspoon (defendant) were married and had two children. Julie joined the Army reserves, and in 1998 she left Danny and took the children with her. Julie was deployed to Germany, and the children moved there in early 2003. In July 2006, the children became ill and were hospitalized in Germany. Julie threatened to hurt herself and the children, so the children were not released to her. The children entered and remained in foster care until they went to California to live with Danny in August 2006. Danny filed a petition for dissolution in California. In October 2006, Julie petitioned the California court to return the children to Germany pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention). Danny and Julie agreed that Germany was the children’s habitual residence, and the trial court found that Danny and Julie shared custody under German law. Danny argued that his removal of the children to Germany was not wrongful because German law permitted him to determine the children’s residence. The California court granted Julie’s petition and ordered the children’s return to Germany. Danny appealed, arguing that his removal was not wrongful.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Aronson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership