Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC v. Marseilles Land and Water Company

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
299 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2002)


Facts

Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC (power company) (plaintiff) had a contract with the Marseilles Land and Water Company (canal company) (defendant) to rent the canal supplying water to its plant. The parties stopped performing when the plant fell into disuse. The power company wanted to operate the plant again and asked the canal company to repair a canal wall. The canal company said no, and the power company sued to enforce the contract and for a preliminary injunction. Subsequently, the canal wall collapsed. The power company requested: (1) an injunction allowing entrance onto canal company property to repair the wall, (2) a lien against the canal company property for the repairs, and (3) a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to pay rent on the unmaintained canal. The canal company counterclaimed for the rent. Within 10 days, the canal company demanded a jury trial, but the district court refused. The judge concluded the issue of the rent was raised by the power company’s claim for a declaratory judgment and demand had to be made within 10 days of that filing. The judge found for the power company. The canal company appealed chiefly based on the denial of a jury trial.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.