Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC v. Marseilles Land and Water Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
299 F.3d 643 (2002)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC (power company) (plaintiff) had a contract with the Marseilles Land and Water Company (canal company) (defendant) to rent the canal supplying water to its plant. The parties stopped performing when the plant fell into disuse. The power company wanted to operate the plant again and asked the canal company to repair a canal wall. The canal company said no, and the power company sued to enforce the contract and for a preliminary injunction. Subsequently, the canal wall collapsed. The power company requested: (1) an injunction allowing entrance onto canal company property to repair the wall, (2) a lien against the canal company property for the repairs, and (3) a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to pay rent on the unmaintained canal. The canal company counterclaimed for the rent. Within 10 days, the canal company demanded a jury trial, but the district court refused. The judge concluded the issue of the rent was raised by the power company’s claim for a declaratory judgment and demand had to be made within 10 days of that filing. The judge found for the power company. The canal company appealed chiefly based on the denial of a jury trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.