Marsh v. Frost National Bank
Texas Court of Appeals
129 S.W.3d 174 (2004)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Charles Walker’s will instructed Frost National Bank (Frost) (plaintiff), as the executor of Walker’s estate, to sell a tract of land and invest the approximately $1 million sale proceeds in secure government bonds. Walker’s stated goal was to create a trust that would eventually provide a million-dollar trust fund for every American aged 18 and over regardless of race, religion, marital status, sexual preference, or wealth. The will expressly stated Walker’s expectation that it would take approximately 346 years for the fund to grow to the point where it could fulfill its intended purpose. After Walker’s death, Frost petitioned the probate court for a declaratory judgment construing the will provision and determining its validity. Anna Marsh, Noel Marsh, and Holly McKee (defendants) argued that the will provision was void because the duration of the purported trust violated the rule against perpetuities (RAP). The Texas attorney general (plaintiff) intervened, arguing that the trust was a charitable trust and was therefore not subject to the RAP. The probate court agreed, concluding that the will created a valid charitable trust. Anna Marsh, Noel Marsh, and Holly McKee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rodriguez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

