Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council

490 U.S. 360, 109 S.Ct. 1851, 104 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council

United States Supreme Court

490 U.S. 360, 109 S.Ct. 1851, 104 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989)

Facts

The Oregon Natural Resources Council and three other non-profit environmental interest groups (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court against John Marsh, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and head of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (defendant) to enjoin construction of the Elk Creek Dam, the last dam to be built as part of a three-dam project in Oregon’s Rogue River Basin. In 1971, the Corps prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) covering the three-dam project as required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The Corps issued a “Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement No. 1” (FEISS) in 1980 and proceeded with construction of the dam in 1982 despite two memoranda released by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service indicating the project would have greater adverse impacts on the environment than previously believed. Plaintiffs argued that the Corps violated NEPA by failing to prepare a second supplemental EIS in response to the information contained in the two memoranda. The district court disagreed and held that a second supplemental EIS was not required. Plaintiffs appealed. The court of appeals reversed and held that the Corps had not adequately addressed the information provided in the two memoranda. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership