Marsh v. Wallace
United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
666 F. Supp. 2d 651 (2009)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Alden "Bubber" Wallace (codefendant) owed money to his longtime lawyer, John Howell (codefendant). Wallace arranged with Howell to repay Howell from the proceeds of Wallace's sale of rental property to Kirk David Marsh (plaintiff). At Wallace's suggestion, Marsh asked Howell to handle Marsh's side of the transaction. Before agreeing to do so, Howell informed Marsh of his debt-repayment arrangement with Wallace. However, Howell did not tell Marsh that the arrangement inevitably created a conflict of interest, and the two men never discussed or agreed as to the nature of Howell's legal role in the transaction. The transaction closed successfully. However, Marsh soon found that his newly acquired property produced less rental income than he expected. Marsh sued Wallace and Howell in federal district court for fraud and legal malpractice, respectively.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.