Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
436 U.S. 307 (1978)


Facts

On September 11, 1975, an inspector with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) appeared at Barlow’s, Inc. (Barlow’s) (defendant), an electrical and plumbing installation business. The inspector asked Bill Barlow, the president and general manager, to enter the non-public area of the premises to perform an inspection. The inspector said that Barlow’s had been selected for inspection as part of OSHA’s regular inspection program.  Barlow asked the inspector if he had a warrant. The inspector said he did not. Barlow refused to allow the inspector to enter the non-public areas of the company premises, based on Fourth Amendment rights against search and seizure. Three months later, the Secretary of OSHA petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Idaho to issue an order compelling Barlow’s to admit the inspector. The district court did so, and the inspector presented the order to Barlow. Barlow again refused to allow inspection and sought injunctive relief against OSHA inspections. A three-judge court ruled in favor of Barlow’s. The Secretary appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.