Marshall v. Nugent

222 F.2d 604 (1955)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marshall v. Nugent

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
222 F.2d 604 (1955)

Play video

Facts

Walter Harriman and his passenger, Frank Marshall (plaintiff), were driving on a highway to Marshall's business appointment. A truck owned by Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. (defendant) cut a corner on the highway and forced Harriman's car off the road. Harriman and Marshall both exited the car and stood on the highway. The Socony truck driver offered to help Harriman pull his car back onto the highway. The driver suggested that Harriman and Marshall step around the truck to warn oncoming cars of the obstacle. Marshall attempted to go and warn the oncoming cars as the driver had suggested. As Marshall did so, a car driven by Robert Nugent (defendant) was coming over the hill toward the oil truck. Nugent saw the oil truck blocking his path, and he swerved to avoid it. Nugent crashed into a guard rail and then hit Marshall, severely injuring him. Marshall brought suit against both Nugent and Socony. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Marshall against Socony for $25,000, as well as a verdict in favor of Nugent. Socony appealed on the ground that the wrongful conduct of its truck driver was not the proximate cause of Marshall’s injuries.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Magruder, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership